Skip to Content
reality TV reviews, news, and analysis since 2000

Is Luke Deardurff’s husband a Spring Baking Championship producer?

Is Luke Deardurff’s husband a Spring Baking Championship producer?
Luke Deardurff, winner of Spring Baking Championship season 9 (Photo by Rob Pryce/Food Network)

People are Very Mad about the conclusion to Spring Baking Championship season 9 for two very different reasons, both involving its winner, Luke Deardurff.

The criticism focuses on two separate things:

  1. That Luke was not as strong a baker as his two finale competitors, Clement and Christian, and
  2. that he had an unfair advantage and benefitted from bias on behalf of the production.

There may be a third reason, at least judging by a handful of social media posts and comments I’ve deleted on reality blurred: Some people seem very upset that a gay man won, which many are communicating by claiming the show went “woke,” which is code for both I hate gay people and I do not know what the word ‘woke’ means.

Let’s leave the bigots behind, where they already are, and examine the other two critiques.

Is Spring Baking Championship’s format fair?

Four people standing at small bar tables
Spring Baking Championship season 9 host Jesse Palmer and judges Nancy Fuller, Duff Goldman, and Kardea Brown (Photo by Food Network)

The first major point of contention is that the weakest baker going into the finale, Luke, won the entire competition.

Luke barely made it into the finale, competing against Molly in a bake-off, and barely winning that—something judge Duff Goldman acknowledged as the judges were deliberating. “He is here by the skin of his teeth,” Duff said.

I think this is a fascinating question and a perfectly legitimate critique of the show’s structure: Should a 10-episode competition come down to a single cake?

A winner is not determined based on cumulative work in the competition, like it is on Chopped, where the judges consider all three courses when deciding the winner.

On Baking Championship, the win is based on the final bake. Luke did the best of the three, even if he had the weakest track record, so he won.

If Spring Baking Championship decided to use Chopped’s format—or did something like assign points based on wins throughout the season—the competition might be more fair. But it’s very likely its finales would be dull and have no suspense at all.

If someone dominated the competition all season, that’d mean the winner would be clear before the finale even begins, and they could serve the judges a plate of cake batter with sprinkles and still win.

A cumulative format seems to me like it works better on Chopped since the competition is just one hour long, and there are just three rounds. But I have also been very disappointed when someone on a competition I like does well all season, botches the final task, and then loses.

Maybe there are other ways to decide a winner! Maybe it’s a point system that gives a lot of weight to the finale, but still takes the season into account.

Did Luke have an unfair advantage?

A person in a pink apron standing with his arms behind him, looking to the right
Luke Deardurff during the Spring Baking Championship season 9 finale (Photo by Food Network)

The second major complaint I’m seeing is a claim of unfairness and rigging, supported by one piece of evidence: that Luke is married to one of Spring Baking Championship’s producers.

Wait, what now? I did not watch every episode of the show, so I thought perhaps I’d missed something, like a disclaimer in the first episode—kind of like when Top Chef has a guest judge who knows one of the contestants, and promises everyone they’ll still judge fairly.

But there was no such disclaimer, because that is not true. This conspiracy theory is easily traced to something very simple: a misheard line from a mid-season episode.

In the first challenge of the April 3 episode, “Love in the Great Outdoors,” the contestants had to create mousse cakes decorated to resemble the night sky.

Luke’s cake had two chocolate figures on either side of a domed sky, and he identified those as “two lovers that are long-distance, and when they look up at the night sky, that they’re looking at the same night sky, therefore they are together and not separated.”

“I like that you incorporate your life, because that makes it real,” judge Kardea Brown said. “I’m pretty sure that’s your husband. It’s just so sweet.”

Those are the exact words she spoke according to the subtitles. Without the subtitles, though, it’s possible to hear the first part of Kardea’s second sentence as a producer instead of “pretty sure.” The audio is also a little choppy, perhaps because a longer comment was cut down in editing, which happens regularly in reality TV post-production.

I totally understand how people misheard; this happened to me just a few weeks ago on Survivor, when I heard someone swear when they did not.

This also reminds me of the viral TikTok video that features a group of football fans chanting and different phrases. Because of the audio quality, their accents, and/or the effect of a group chanting, the brain can interpret the sound in multiple ways, sounding like they may be saying any of those phrases, which all have the same number of syllables.

Back to Spring Baking Championship: What Kardea said was quickly debunked in a Reddit thread, yet that claim has reemerged post-finale, a convenient conspiracy theory that explained why the win went to a baker who some viewers thought was not worthy.

There’s no evidence of Luke being a recipient of some kind of nepotistic favoritism, nor is he married to a crew member. A Food Network spokesperson confirmed that to me this morning:

Luke is not married to a Producer, nor did he have any pre-existing relationship to anyone associated with the show that led to him being cast.

As is often the case, the truth is simpler: Luke just baked the best final cake, according to the judges’ subjective evaluation (and they were, of course, the only ones who actually tasted it).

Whether or not Spring Baking Championship should determine its winner based on just one cake is a good question, but is not a conspiracy.

All reality blurred content is independently selected, including links to products or services. However, if you buy something after clicking an affiliate link, we may earn a commission, which helps support reality blurred. Learn more.

About the writer

Discussion: your turn

The writing here is the start of a conversation, and reality blurred values your contributions to that conversation. We’ve created a community that connects people through open and thoughtful conversations about the TV we’re watching, the pop culture we’re consuming, and the stories about it.

To share our perspectives and exchange ideas in a welcoming, supportive space, there are rules for commenting here. By commenting below, you confirm that you’ve read and agree to those rules.

Happy discussing!

Betty

Friday 6th of October 2023

I am not at all surprised to see that Luke won. He is a storyteller. In every bake he told a story. The most successful people in the world are those who are able to tell a story. Google “Harvard art and science of storytelling” and you will find the definition of why Luke deserved to win. And in particular, in the final bake. Luke was the the ONLY baker to tell the story of the engaged couple…in a wedding cake! Clement and Christian failed. They simply “copied and pasted” what their respective engaged couples wanted in their wedding cakes.

Luke told THEIR STORY.

Game over.

Congrats, Luke!

Aunt Margie

Friday 11th of August 2023

The producers need to realize they created a Guy’s Grocery Games dynamic. The final three tiered cake is the Shopping List Game. Contestants bake a variety of international historic and modern desserts for a chance to play Decorate the Three Tiered cake. On GGG one contestant can get 5 easy clues vs five hard clues, or can’t run as fast. It has little to do with cooking. This has little to do with baking. Like was not the best baker, he was given the theme that best represented a wedding cake. Better bakers list because they weren’t allowed to use their full baking skills.

Paula

Friday 26th of May 2023

The last two seasons the bakers accumulated tokens (flowers and butterflies in the last season) for pre-heat and main-heat wins which I think should be considered in the finale judging.

Carly

Sunday 25th of June 2023

@Paula, agreed I believe they’ve lost a lot of viewers for this last season

Bobbi E.

Monday 22nd of May 2023

I think the personality and life stories of contestants have appeal to the audience and make for entertaining shows, but unfairly influence the judges. Popular tv personalities can continue to interact with contestants during the challenges and baking process but not be involved with judging.

I agree with others that recommend bringing in blind testers to judge the finished results of each challenge based on specific criteria and score each one. Winner would be determined by most points.

Bobbi E.

Monday 22nd of May 2023

The two superior bakers throughout the competition lost to a baker that consistently made a poor showing until the final challenge. Don’t waste the viewers and contestants time if the winner is chosen from the results of a single challenge. So disappointed, felt like the whole competition was fixed!