Skip to Content
reality TV reviews, news, and analysis since 2000

Winner aside, Ciao House’s fatal flaw kept it from being fantastico

Winner aside, Ciao House’s fatal flaw kept it from being fantastico
Ciao House judges Gabriele Bertaccini and Alex Guarnaschelli eat what the chef contestants have prepared for them. Are they sad because of the flavors or because they realize the show they're on is a wreck? (Photo by Food Network)

Ciao House, Food Network’s Tuscany-set cooking competition which is approaching its finale next week, had everything going for it: an outstanding location, a rich culinary history to draw from, and Iron Chef Alex Guarnaschelli and her friend and chef Gabriele Bertaccini as mentors and judges.

The chefs also learn from what Food Network described as “local experience[s] steeped in tradition,” which ranged “[f]rom real-life nonnas showcasing how they make pasta from scratch to a lesson with the head butcher of a three centuries-old family butcher business.”

Then, the chefs were tested based on those lessons, preparing meals for Alex and Gabe, and for each other. They all sat around a wood table and ate together, tasting and commenting on each other’s dishes.

This was a perfect setup. So why was did it produce such a massive fail?

Seven people standing around a table outside, looking at the plates of food on it
Ciao House’s judges, Gabe and Alex, and the final five: Saba, Corey, Sarah, Preston, and Natalia, all looking as despondent as I look while I watch their show (Photo by Food Network)

From the way Ciao House was presented, I expected a format similar to Netflix’s School of Chocolate, on which pastry chefs also competed in teams, judged by Amaury Guichon.

While I thought that show had too much manufactured drama, it did make one brilliant choice: keeping all eight contestants through all eight episodes. Those who didn’t do as well got one-on-one feedback from Amaury Guichon, and therefore an opportunity to get better.

With just eight episodes and 10 chefs, Ciao House could have used this format.

That would have allowed the 10 chefs—Omar Ashley, Corey Becker, Saba Duffy, Trenica Johnson, Jess Mahoney, Preston Paine, Sarah Raffetto, Justin Robinson, Natalia Rosario, and Matt Wasson—so savor their time in Tuscany, learning from Alex and Gabe and all of the experiences.

It would have also allowed them to connect with each other—competing, yes, but also sharing in their common experience.

Instead, as I wrote in my review of the premiere, it sent home one person for a nonsensical reason, and then just got worse from there. That was a fatal decision, at least in terms of Ciao House’s potential.

10 people standing and posing in front of two people who are sitting at a small table covered with a tablecloth; their backs are to us
Ciao House’s contestants face the first judging in episode 1 (Photo by Food Network)

The deliberations were awkward, just the chefs standing around in the dirt and turning to each other and then turning back around to cast their votes out loud.

If a show is going to do voting, it should at least give it some formality and weight, like RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars does (even though voting doesn’t work there, either), or make the ritual seem like less of an afterthought.

Why not have everyone gather around a table to discuss and vote?

Having a competition where competitors vote each other off is nothing new, but doing that 1) in teams with 2) just 10 contestants totals meant many of the decisions came down to friendships or alliances, none of which were developed enough to make them interesting.

If you want a strategic show, make that! But Ciao House produced drama that is both unnecessary and unearned.

Six people standing outside with their hands folded in front of them
Ciao House’s final six chefs before the episode 4 elimination (Photo by Food Network)

This format flaw opened up a dam that allowed a torrent of the Internet’s misogyny. At the end of episode five, Sarah and Saba voted Corey out of their three-person team—because that was the best move.

Saba admitted that. “I want to get rid of the strongest player,” she said. Of course, the player, not the game, got all the hate. (And let’s not forget Corey screwed up a farro dish admid all this.)

Sarah, meanwhile, was criticized both on the show and online for making it farther in the game because she’s not as strong a chef.

Preston said, “It’s really tough. To see Sarah still here is difficult for me because I know how badly Corey wants to be here.” Oh yes, Preston, it’s only Corey who wanted to be there.

Cut to Sarah crying, and then buying into this very dumb argument, saying she made it to episode six with “a bit more strategy and luck than out-chefing my peers.” Of course you did! That’s the game.

When even the show’s own contestants are blaming themselves, that’s a signal that the format doesn’t work. Survivor players certainly struggle with decisions and relationships, but they know they’re there to compete based on strategy, not talent.

Five people reach for ingredients on a kitchen island that's full of food and cooking equipment
Ciao House’s final four—Preston, Saba, Sarah, and Natalia—in the kitchen with judges Alex Guarnaschelli and Gabe Bertaccini (Photo by Food Network)

At every opportunity, the producers tried to ramp up the tension. Preston and Corey, as team captains, got to go to a cheese tasting, and then select cheeses their teams would cook with. That was revealed t the other three contestants as a kind of gotcha moment: haha, your captains went and you didn’t! There were five people left! Why not take them all?

All of Ciao House was unnecessarily structured around creating that kind of artificial drama, instead of giving more time and attention to the chef’s work, and everything that surrounded them.

Although they lived together, they might as well have been staying in a Hampton Inn on an interstate exit, that’s how much it seemed like they were in Italy together.

There are more unnecessary twits to come: Food Network teased that, in the penultimate episode, “The two remaining chefs’ finale plans are turned upside down when hosts and judges Alex Guarnaschelli and Gabe Bertaccini invite some ‘familia’ back to the villa for one last chance at redemption.”

Ugh. How dumb and uninspired. Again, why not just keep everyone for the entire eight episodes? And why take the success of the two finalists away from him?

In the finale itself, there will be “a cooking duel to see which previously eliminated chef will earn a spot in the finale” and its “winner will join the other two finalists to cook one last meal,” Food Network said.

Whoever wins after all that—whether it’s Saba continuing to dominate or Corey coming back from the dead to win—good for them, and my deepest regrets that they had to go through this to get there.

Instead of leaning in to the joy and experience of living together in Tuscany, and experiencing its food and locations, Ciao House took that away from the chefs, and stuck them into this wreck of a show.

Ciao House

A great set up, which I originally graded a B-, but since that was followed by terrible execution, for the whole season it’s a D

What works for me:

  • The location
  • The lessons in Tuscany
  • Alex and Gabe as a duo

What could be better:

  • Allowing everyone to participate in the lessons
  • The voting format
  • The unnecessary drama

All reality blurred content is independently selected, including links to products or services. However, if you buy something after clicking an affiliate link, we may earn a commission, which helps support reality blurred. Learn more.

About the writer

Discussion: your turn

The writing here is the start of a conversation, and reality blurred values your contributions to that conversation. We’ve created a community that connects people through open and thoughtful conversations about the TV we’re watching, the pop culture we’re consuming, and the stories about it.

To share our perspectives and exchange ideas in a welcoming, supportive space, there are rules for commenting here. By commenting below, you confirm that you’ve read and agree to those rules.

Happy discussing!

Carolyn Snuggs

Tuesday 20th of February 2024

Alex could judge without sounding hateful. A smile would help

Kate

Tuesday 23rd of January 2024

So sad - this show had great potential. However, the choice to focus on manufactured drama and nastiness instead of the joy and beauty of Italy and Italian cuisine is just sad. There is far too much nastiness and divisiveness in our world today - stop adding to it.

Philip

Sunday 23rd of July 2023

What a great idea, beautiful location and foody country. However, I have never watched a show that was so poorly executed. It was supposed to be a show based on talent, but the best chefs were voted off, still scratching me head. What was Food Network thinking? Alex admits in the last episode that Corey is the best chef and consistently the best through the entire show. So how does the best chef not make the last 2? Gabe said he wanted to eat a full portion of Corey's dish, but he doesn't make the last 2? It is cringe worthy when even the other contestants feel bad for still being on the show when they see the best voted off. Giada is gone from the network, in a big misstep, they let Valerie go and now this talent show that is not awarded on talent? It makes you wonder who is in charge and wonder what is going on at Food Network. This was a recipe for disaster.

Kathy

Sunday 9th of July 2023

Felt show was a personality competition not a cooking completion. Frustrating to watch

Brandi Lewis

Wednesday 5th of July 2023

What a great opportunity missed. It hate manufactured high school drama survivor shows. I thought this would be a beautiful authentic Tuscan real food learning experience. Instead some of the best chefs got voted off for strategy. It was a not good feeling show and I am disappointed that these respected judges lowered themselves to this level. Do better.