Skip to Content
reality TV reviews, news, and analysis since 2000

Restaurant Impossible left Food Network for Discovery+

Restaurant Impossible left Food Network for Discovery+
Robert Irvine throws furniture onto the ground during the 2013 "Holiday Impossible 2" episode of Restaurant: Impossible, on which he helped the Ship Bottom Volunteer Fire Company. (Photo by Emile Wamsteker/Food Network)

Restaurant: Impossible returned for its 18th season on Food Network on Jan. 7, with an episode titled “Changing with the Times.” Actually, it was titled: “Discovery+ First Look: Changing with the Times.” While the title referred to the restaurant, it also was perfect for the episode itself, and not just because construction manager Tom Bury was replaced, temporarily, by Lynn Kegan (Tom and his wife had a baby).

That’s because the episode was the last episode of the Robert Irvine-hosted restaurant makeover show to air on Food Network.

A bug on the lower-right of the screen soon appeared to explain that this was an “exclusive preview,” informing us that “new episodes [are] moving to Discovery+”. (Yes, they used the word “preview” for a show that’s been on Food Network for a decade now.)

During the first commercial break, the change was made even more clear in a promo, whose narrator said, “Love Restaurant Impossible? Now, Discovery+ is the only place to watch new episodes.”

Discovery+ is the new streaming service from Food Network’s parent company; it costs $5 a month, or $7 a month without ads.

This seems like a risky strategy to me. It’s one thing to offer a library of past shows and new shows on a pay service. That’s what Disney+ did, for example, with old movies plus new shows like The Mandalorian.

But Disney+ also shifted original content from cable to streaming: some shows intended for National Geographic Channel, such as Jeff Goldblum’s show, went to Disney+ instead. So this is part of a growing trend, I fear.

Robert Irvine apologizes to fans

Robert Irvine, Tom Bury, Restaurant Impossible
Robert Irvine and his long-suffering construction manager Tom Bury on an episode of Restaurant Impossible. (Photo by Emile Wamsteker/Food Network)

Restaurant: Impossible was not on the list of “exclusive original series” that the service released in mid-December, which suggests this was a more-recent decision—or something they didn’t want to publicize back then.

It’s not thrilled fans of the show. While one person tweeted to Robert Irvine, that they “may drop everything else for Discovery plus including satellite. Literally 90% of what we watch is on there,” another person tweeted that it was “Incredibly disappointing” that the show was moving to pay streaming.

To the second person Irvine responded, “I am sorry. It’s way above my power .. I have am sending all these comments to the network.”

Another person responded, “Just cannot justify *more* money for another streaming service. Love all your shows, Chef, hate to see it pulled.” Robert replied to them, too, adding a prayer hands emoji to the end of his tweet, which said, “I will promise and sorry , but I understand.”

Those hoping Discovery will reverse its decision are probably going to be even more disappointed. When someone expressed hope that Robert Irvine could get executives to change their mind, he tweeted, “Unfortunately that’s unrealistic I think , but I am sending all these comments from my platforms.”

Why is Restaurant Impossible leaving Food Network?

For those already paying for cable, taking away shows they already love—the reasons why they’re paying for cable—may be enough encouragement for them to cancel cable, accelerating the demise of cable.

Last summer, Variety’s Michael Schneider and Kate Aurthur reported in a must-read story about how cable is “struggling for survival,” dropping from 105 million houses with cable in 2010 to 82.9 million in 2020.

What really caused a decline were streaming services like Netflix and Hulu. And that’s why, as the story’s subtitle says, “media companies that once relied on cable TV are chasing streaming dollars instead.”

I wonder how many people will end up like me: I’ll miss watching Restaurant: Impossible, but that one show is not enough of a reason to convince me to pay for Discovery+ at this point.

So many shows across Food Network, HGTV, and Discovery are fine to watch and nice to have as background, but aren’t something I feel the need to watch weekly, like I do when season two of The Mandalorian came out, or when Netflix’s The Circle returns this year.

And while I might not have subscribed to Hulu for an unknown show like Padma Lakshmi’s oustanding Taste the Nation, I will stay a subscriber for more of it—or more high-quality shows like it.

Restaurant Impossible goes from cancelled to subscription-only

Restaurant Impossible Robert Irvine Jodi Theresa's Restaurant
The look on the kid’s face is a good summary of my reaction to this episode of Restaurant Impossible. (Photo by Food Network)

This is another twist in Restaurant: Impossible’s rocky 10-year history.

Robert Irvine was first host of Dinner: Impossible, but Food Network fired him for “embellishments and inaccuracies in his resume.” Thought he was replaced by Michael Symon, Irvine came back final three seasons.

That show led to a spin-off, Restaurant: Impossible, which took the form of Gordon Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmares and premiered Jan. 19, 2011.

In 2016, after two seasons of mostly awful ambush episodes that seemed like desperate attempt at juicing up the ratings, Robert Irvine’s show was cancelled.

It returned in 2019 with a terrific, refreshed season that went the opposite direction: instead of the phony drama of the ambush episodes, the producing was less heavy-handed.

Robert Irvine also started revisiting past restaurants as part of a new series—which continued during 2020, when he visited restaurants he’d previously helped that were now suffering because of the pandemᎥc.

Now, you have to pay to see it.

Of course, we were already paying to watch it: Food Network is a cable channel.

But clearly, the economics make more sense for the company to get people to pay them directly, then to get paid by cable companies per cable subscriber.

In a filing with the SEC at the end of its 2019 fiscal year, Discovery said “per subscriber payments also represent a significant portion of our revenue,” so cable TV viewers still matter. How many of them will Discovery alienate by taking away a long-running reality show?

And how will this affect the restaurants? Besides a makeover of their space and menu, the restaurants featured get publicity and exposure, which is helpful for an industry where, in normal times, “Sixty percent of restaurants don’t make it past their first year and 80 percent go out of business within five years,” as FSR magazine reported.

Now the only exposure they’ll get is to people paying for Discovery+.

All reality blurred content is independently selected, including links to products or services. However, if you buy something after clicking an affiliate link, I may earn a commission, which helps support reality blurred. Learn more.

More from reality blurred

About the author

  • Andy Dehnart

    Andy Dehnart is the creator of reality blurred and a writer and teacher who obsessively and critically covers reality TV and unscripted entertainment, focusing on how it’s made and what it means.

Discussion: your turn

I think of writing about television as the start of a conversation, and I value your contributions to that conversation. We’ve created a community that connects people through open and thoughtful conversations about the TV we’re watching and the stories about it.

To share our perspectives and exchange ideas in a welcoming, supportive space, I’ve created these rules for commenting here. By commenting below, you confirm that you’ve read and agree to those rules.

Happy discussing!


Monday 24th of April 2023

Thank you for explaining what happened to the show. Restaurant Impossible was one of the few shows I tuned in to see on The Food Network. Diners Drive Ins & Dives was the other. Years ago, they had many shows I liked. Then they decided to focus on eating and competitions, not good food, i.e. Cupcakes competition, food trucks, Chopped, you know, total junk TV. Instead of Man vs.. Food, they should have just called it Hogs at the Trough. I've already been exploring other non-cable venues the last 3 years and found there's better stuff out there -- and I refuse to pay more for cable just who mostly offers reruns. That's what Food Network is, rerun city. Even their new shows are just more of the same.