Skip to Content

Why Adam Ruins Everything—and The G Word with Adam Conover—is so effective

Why Adam Ruins Everything—and The G Word with Adam Conover—is so effective
Adam Conover in the Adam Ruins Everything season one episode "Adam Ruins Going Green." (Image by truTV)

With its comical debunking of common misunderstandings truTV’s Adam Ruins Everything has become my favorite scripted nonfiction show. While it uses actors and has writers, it’s dedicated to telling the truth.

But how do you convince viewers of that truth, especially when they’ve been told and convinced otherwise? How do you break through our human stubbornness?

The answer: a combination of narrative and humor. But not just any jokes work. Adam Ruins Everything’s humor is effective for a reason.

I explored how the show’s arguments come together—and the use of humor to persuade—in a new article in the September/October 2018 issue of Pacific Standard magazine, which is now online: Saving Critical Thinking, One Joke at a Time.

That wouldn’t have been possible without the time and insight that several people shared with me, primarily Adam Conover, who created and stars in Adam Ruins Everything, and Dr. Danna Young, whose research looks at humor and persuasion in political comedy. (She’s also spectacular on Twitter.)

As with any magazine article, there’s great material that doesn’t make the cut, often because of space, like the detail that there’s an eight-page “argument bible” Conover created for the show’s writers and researchers for season two that “describes the table legs of the show,” as he told me: the argument, the comedy, and the story.

So, here are a few outtakes from my interviews with Conover and Young.

One of the many fascinating things Young shared with me about her research is how humor can either “undermine” or “enhance recall and comprehension” in classrooms. The difference lies in how jokes are structured.

“You can use humor to teach people things because humor is fun and they’ll pay attention and they’ll learn more. The problem is that if the humor that you’re using is not central to whatever the concept is you’re trying to illustrate, all you’re going to do is undermine your audience’s ability to learn the thing. Because now they’re so busy getting a joke and those resources are not dedicated to learning the thing you want them to learn. It serves as a distraction,” she told me.

Adam Ruins Everything’s structure works because “there’s no ambiguity about what he is actually saying,” she said. “The heart of the humor in that show is directly tied to exactly what the premise is of his argument.”

There is one potential problem with the show’s jokes, and that connects to Conover’s character, Adam, and his scripted annoyingness, which irritates the people around him.

As Dr. Young told me:

“As smart as the humor is, as much as it uses these hyperbolic analogies to illustrate things really well, we still are people who want to believe people who we like and who we have an affection for. If we like someone, we like everything that they touch and everything that they say to us. And if we hate someone, we hate everything that they touch and everything they say to us. That’s one point where I don’t know that they’ve got that right.”

Almost all of the choices Adam Ruins Everything has made, since it was born as a College Humor sketch, make Adam Ruins Everything’s jokes more persuasive than other shows. (The origin story and details about why it’s so persuasive are in my Pacific Standard piece.)

But Conover wants to keep improving.

“We’re really, really good at the research,” he said. “But speaking to the audience’s emotional truth is something that I am really interested in doing better and better. That’s how you build trust with them, and that’s how you actually change minds.

“There’s a lot of people in life and on TV who just want to say, Here’s what’s true. Mic drop! If you disagree with me, you’re a fucking asshole. I’m going to walk away; I don’t need to talk to idiots like you. That’s fine; I like a lot of those shows, they’re very cathartic,” Conover said.

“But our explicit goal is to change people’s minds about stuff that they care deeply about. Even when we are right, I’m very concerned with how much we get through to people.”

How Adam Ruins Everything models what it teaches

Adam Ruins Everything, Hollywood, Adwin Brown, Adam Conover
Actor Adwin Brown and host Adam Conover in the season-two premiere of Adam Ruins Everything. (Photo by Erica Parise/truTV)

Two years ago, when I criticized Adam Ruins Everything’s episode on reality TV, Adam Conover responded, in writing and in an interview with me.

Between that kind of willingness to engage critics and the show’s on-screen and online sourcing of its claims, it’s focused on getting things right.

Transparency and accuracy is so important that the series even devoted a season-two episode, “Emily Ruins Adam,” to the show’s own mistakes and potential flaws.

One problem that episode explored was the “backfire effect.” People with strong beliefs actually double-down on their ideas when presented with contradictory information, because it threatens their identity— they put up shields rather than change their mind.

The expert who appeared in the episode, Stephan Lewandowsky, the co-author of The Debunking Handbook, discussed techniques for countering it, including presenting alternative narratives and repeating information.

Adam Ruins Everything, it turns out, does both of those things regularly.

“I didn’t know that when I created the show,” Conover told me for my Pacific Standard story, in part of the interview that didn’t make the final story. “I didn’t know that was a more effective way to teach people.” Instead, he “stumbled into that same process” by thinking about what kinds of arguments worked on him and “imaging myself sitting there watching it in front of the TV.”

Conover also told me that he’s aware that two seasons of ruining things has yet to change the world. Take polygraphs, for example.

“We really demolished that topic on our show,” he said. “We gave a really bulletproof argument for how terrible these things are, and that they shouldn’t be used in any way that is going to affect people’s lives. I was really proud of myself. Then a month later, I was like: Wait a minute. Polygraph tests are still being used.”

Conover is driven by a deep desire to help people, to change their minds, and to use what’s worked on him to convince others. “People are really retreating into their bubbles and having trouble and listening to different sources of information,” he said.

There’s more work for Adam Ruins Everything to do—and thankfully, it’ll soon begin season three.

All reality blurred content is independently selected, including links to products or services. However, if you buy something after clicking an affiliate link, I may earn a commission, which helps support reality blurred. Learn more.

More great stories

About the author

  • Andy Dehnart is the creator of reality blurred and a writer and teacher who obsessively and critically covers reality TV and unscripted entertainment, focusing on how it’s made and what it means.


I value our community at reality blurred, which connects people through open and thoughtful conversations about the TV we’re watching and the stories about it.

Comment rules: My goal is for us to be able to share our perspectives and exchange ideas in a welcoming, supportive space. That’s why I’ve created these rules for commenting here. By commenting below, you confirm that you’ve read and agree to them.

Happy discussing!