Skip to Content

Why Survivors drew marbles for the loved ones reward challenge

Why Survivors drew marbles for the loved ones reward challenge
Survivor 35 cast member Mike Zahalsky, holding up a marble during the episode 12 reward challenge. (Image by CBS)

Survivor Heroes vs. Healers vs. Hustlers gave its seven final contestants the chance to win time with their family members, and did so with a challenge that asked them to simply draw one of two marbles out of a bag. If the marbles matched, that pair stayed in the challenge; if they didn’t, the pair was eliminated.

Why did Survivor forgo its beautiful, signature challenge builds, complex puzzles, and frequently physical challenges and replace them with a random challenge—choosing marbles from a bag—that was, as I wrote in my recap, less interesting to watch than a coin toss?

There was a reason, though it was not because the challenge had to be replaced at the last minute because of weather or another external factor, which would have been understandable. (I’d absolutely rather the production do a marble draw than, say, run a challenge in extreme heat.)

It wasn’t because of a limited budget, or the physical limitations of the loved ones who were also participating.

Instead, the reason was time.

The production didn’t want to use up time with loved ones competing in a challenge so they could have more time “for the actual love,” as host and showrunner Jeff Probst said, and he was not kidding.

Here’s what Probst told EW’s Dalton Ross:

“This originated from a simple problem of too much story and not enough time in the episode. We only have 43 minutes in a one-hour episode. You have to carefully allocate where the time goes. We wanted to involve the loved ones but we didn’t want it to take as long as a full-on challenge because we wanted to have plenty of time for the actual love. So our challenge department came up with a simple game of chance. We were very happy with how it played and surprisingly it actually bonded all the players as they were ‘willing’ their loved one to grab the right marble.”

I’m truly surprised that they were happy with the challenge. It did produce a minor dramatic moment when the final two were Ben and Chrissy, who we’d just established are are former friends and mortal enemies. But Chrissy’s choices didn’t really seem to matter at all.

The production was so very worried about not having enough time that they sacrificed their creative? That’s especially weird because so much of what may or may not take time was unknown at the time the challenge was planned and occurred. What if Tribal Council wasn’t interesting, or if there were few interesting moments at camp, which has been happening a lot all season? We would have then had to deal with a lot of filler.

Then again, a concern for time has been affecting Survivor’s creative for years: ever since it stopped showing the full theme song and credits in order to reclaim a few seconds.

So how much time was saved?

It took about nine minutes for all the family member reunions and sexist commentary. The challenge itself took  about three minutes and 30 seconds, from the time Probst explained the rules of the challenge to Chrissy’s win.

That’s definitely quick, but not that quick. Entire reward challenges usually take fewer than seven minutes (just look at recent reward challenges).

They couldn’t spare another 2.5 minutes to have a decent challenge? Or figure out a better way to use 3.5 minutes? That’s about the length of the Grand Prize Game, and watching the contestants and their loved ones throw ping-pong balls into buckets would have been significantly more entertaining.

Including Chrissy’s picks, which lasted for another two minutes or so, the entire segment took about 15 minutes, so I understand that it’s a lot more than double the usual reward challenge time.

Still, if the show is truly that worried about time, and “wanted to have plenty of time for the actual love,” as Probst said, why not just let everyone hang out with their loved ones and forgo the entire challenge part?

All reality blurred content is independently selected, including links to products or services. However, if you buy something after clicking an affiliate link, I may earn a commission, which helps support reality blurred. Learn more.

More great stories

About the author

  • Andy Dehnart is the creator of reality blurred and a writer and teacher who obsessively and critically covers reality TV and unscripted entertainment, focusing on how it’s made and what it means.


I value our community at reality blurred, which connects people through open and thoughtful conversations about the TV we’re watching and the stories about it.

Comment rules: My goal is for us to be able to share our perspectives and exchange ideas in a welcoming, supportive space. That’s why I’ve created these rules for commenting here. By commenting below, you confirm that you’ve read and agree to them.

Happy discussing!