Skip to Content

Review: Jail is awful, and so is A&E’s 60 Days In

Review: Jail is awful, and so is A&E’s 60 Days In

A police officer, Tami, is leaving her wife and a daughter for two months to be locked in jail, even though she’s done nothing wrong. Her only crime is agreeing to be on a reality series: A&E’s 60 Days In.

Tami’s wife, Joelle, says, “I’m afraid that she doesn’t know what she’s getting into.” Sophia, their child, tells the camera, “I know my mom is going away for a lot of weeks. I don’t like it.”

Me, either, Sophia.

As absurd as this idea sounded on paper, I watched the first two hours with as much of an open mind as possible, wanting it to surprise me. I was definitely surprised.

The first of those hours introduces the innocent people—including Muhammad Ali’s daughter Maryum—and makes the case for why they wanted to voluntarily go to jail. Many of them have reasons that make some sense: they’re military or law enforcement who want to know what it’s like inside. Tami wants to understand what it’s like for the people she’s locked up.

Except this is an argument that falls apart upon any kind of examination.

Just like A&E’s pointless Fit to Fat to Fit, on which trainers gained weight to then lose it again, it’s an exercise in obviousness. Do firefighters need to set their own homes ablaze to empathize with those they help? Does a baker need to sit in an oven for an hour to understand what cakes go through?

The people who do go into harm’s way intentionally—firefighters, police officers, military personnel—are well-trained and prepared. They are not novices. The same is even true for other extreme reality shows. Naked and Afraid has an absurd premise, but its contestants are trained survivalists who want to challenge themselves in extreme conditions.

Shocking revelations: jail is terrible!

60 Days In is the kind of gritty, reality-of-life, ethically challenged reality television that A&E has made its thing. It’s well-produced, insofar as it’s tightly edited, creating atmosphere well.

But like the premise, it falls apart upon examination.

The show repeatedly uses the exact same footage of violence to reinforce the terror, and while I have no doubt that’s real and certainly the reality of prison life, repeating the same moments over and over again is manipulative at best.

There’s a lot of intercut footage that ramps up the tension, like scary looks, though it’s clear those are coming from different moments. (The major clue is the difference between surveillance footage, used when there is clearly no camera crew in the pod, and footage from hand-held cameras.)

Also: It may be legal, but how ethical is it to turn other inmates into reality show characters without their consent? What they think of as surveillance cameras are instead Big Brother-ish cameras, recording their every move and turning it into entertainment.

60 Days In is a kind of reality TV Orange is the New Black—which, yes, is fictional entertainment, though based on a memoir—but the A&E version offers nothing new to the conversation.

Sure, it does a swell job of illustrating how terrible and awful jail is. But is that news? I know very little about our corrections system and absolutely nothing surprised me. All it does for me is spark conversation about why this ever became a show.

Since the producers’ cover story is that they’re making a documentary about first-time inmates, why not just make a documentary about first-time inmates? You know, actual people? Like Lockup has been doing for 15 years on MSNBC? Why the charade?

The flimsy premise—that this is the only way the new sheriff could understand what’s happening in his jail—is ludicrous. On-screen text tells us that these participants are doing this “to expose crime and corruption within the jail.” When law enforcement’s only hope is this kind of reality television, there is no hope.

A&E: now with threats of prison rape as entertainment

What’s most egregious is that someone has been cast and edited to be the villain, the guy we root for bad things to happen to. This is Robert, a teacher who is confident, cocky, and ego-driven, and seems dismissive of the whole project that he volunteered for.

The first episode ends with Robert entering his cell block, alone, and it is a genuinely terrifying moment—again, the show is quite good at illustrating life in this environment. Almost immediately quickly, we hear someone say—and also get captions, though we don’t actually see the inmate saying it—“He’s new. He’s got a tight booty. I’m going to fuck him.”

Yes, prison rape as a consequence for being a cocky reality show participant: that’s where this show has gone.

By that point, Robert has been turned into such a hatable character that it’s almost a gleeful thing, like, Oh yes, he’s gonna get what he deserves!

Oddly, at the start of the second episode, when we see him enter the cell block yet again, that comment is missing. (Was it just created in editing?) Robert sets about being his cocky self, asking another inmate, “Do you get the NFL Network here?” and tells another, “This seems like a country club.” He bungles his cover story and says he ran a stop sign on the interstate. He’s such an idiot that the other inmates think he’s a cop with an earpiece. Give those men a prize!

Robert is later blamed by on-screen text that says he’s ignoring his training, as if sitting in a conference room and being talked to constitutes actual “training.” I’m not sure if his confidence comes from thinking this is a TV show and nothing can go wrong, but if this is truly who he is, casting him was a terrifying error.

The second episode ends with an inmate being sucker punched in the head, and the implication is that he’s being punished for trying to help Robert. So yes, A&E is now responsible for prison violence.

Hey, look! I found the ethical transgressions and corruption in jail: and it belongs to a television show.

All reality blurred content is independently selected, including links to products or services. However, if you buy something after clicking an affiliate link, I may earn a commission, which helps support reality blurred. Learn more.

More great stories

About the author

  • Andy Dehnart is the creator of reality blurred and a writer and teacher who obsessively and critically covers reality TV and unscripted entertainment, focusing on how it’s made and what it means.

Discussion

I value our community at reality blurred, which connects people through open and thoughtful conversations about the TV we’re watching and the stories about it.

Comment rules: My goal is for us to be able to share our perspectives and exchange ideas in a welcoming, supportive space. That’s why I’ve created these rules for commenting here. By commenting below, you confirm that you’ve read and agree to them.

Happy discussing!

Pinche

Tuesday 14th of June 2022

You say: "how ethical is it to turn other inmates into reality show characters without their consent?"

Talking about the series intent and the rights of the prisoners, the producer recalled, “We had around 300 inmates who were willing to participate. We’re not coming out and deceiving anyone; we’re just telling them the doc is about first-timers and that’s the place we landed where everyone felt comfortable.”

Each member of the Clark and Fulton County Jails, both inmate and faculty member, had to sign a standard release form. They agree to be part of a documentary.

----------

On another note:

The A&E show also pays money to the prison to film there. For example, the show paid $60,000 to the Clark County jail for filming there over 120 days—about $500 per day. The jail's sheriff Jamey Noel said that the money, "will go to training and equipment actually for the jail."

Ray

Thursday 26th of May 2022

Think it’s a shady set up for these volunteers. How do they find these people. Scary at how little control they have of these people. Talking about testing the marine fir drugs like it was his problem. Scary to think someone could get set up and they don’t even have a constant watch over them ti see what’s really happening to them. They say they need hell…well you could say that again and again.

DJ

Sunday 26th of December 2021

This is one of the worst critiques I have ever read. First, you try make this ridiculous comparison to a firefighter setting a building on fire to empathize with people who's house burns down as if it's even close to being the same thing. Jails send people in undercover like this all the time the entire point of the show is that they are taking advantage of this already used concept in order to get a candid look at what goes on in the jail system in exchange for uncovering potential flaws in the system AS WELL AS getting the volunteer some unique in-depth experience. Which honestly is a totally viable tactic maybe if some of these CO's understood how bad it was in some of these jails then they would treat prisoners better and improve the overall system. The show has undeniably improved many of the jails they visited, some of the problems they exposed were dangers to not only the lives of the guards but of the inmates as well. They also didn't just expose problems from the inmates, but also problems with the staff and the way that guards were treating the inmates. They did that multiple times. Second, you yourself even said things like "It’s well-produced, insofar as it’s tightly edited, creating atmosphere well." and "the show is quite good at illustrating life in this environment." which basically just exposes your bias. You are basically telling anybody who likes this type of show that it does what it is trying to do very well. So basically the only reason why you're bashing the show is because you don't like the premise of it to begin with and now you're disguising it in this article as if it is some kind of professional critique. This is the equivalent of a food critic walking into a restaurant and ordering Spaghetti and afterwards giving a bad rating saying "Sorry I don't like this." and then when the chef replies "I apologize sir, may I ask why?" and the food critic looks at him and says "because I don't like spaghetti.". It's ridiculous. Then, the icing on the cake is the way you end the article saying "The second episode ends with an inmate being sucker punched in the head -- So yes, A&E is now responsible for prison violence.". What a ridiculous statement. How exactly is A&E responsible for that? The people responsible are the prisoner that threw the punch and the grown adult that volunteered and accepted the risks to be on the show. That just goes to prove that you're only trying to confirm your bias rather than actually review the show based on the quality of it's content, you're pulling Olympic-level mental gymnastics for the sake of bashing the show and making it seem as bad as possible when in reality you're only discrediting your whole review. This doesn't come off as a review so much as it does bitching and moaning about a show you didn't like before the intro even finished.

Michael

Wednesday 8th of December 2021

A&E should be ashamed of this type of television. I watched one of these episodes and also thought them to be responsible for a crime one of the inmates committed.

Ray

Thursday 26th of May 2022

@Michael, I totally agree. Was very worried their volunteers were gonna get set up and have no recourse because nobody was watching to protect them. Why would someone volunteer and commit a crime knowing they are being watched (or so they think). I was not confident they would make it through without something happening to them. Felt bad for Isaiah who was definitely being racially profiled but is that actually surprising…not fir me!