Skip to Content

Jeff Probst says half of Survivor’s women have no chance to win

Jeff Probst says half of Survivor’s women have no chance to win
Jeff Probst hosting Survivor Cambodia: Second Chance; he thinks half the women and zero men have no chance of winning. (Photo by Monty Brinton/CBS)

Jeff Probst’s in-season predictions about Survivor are, I’ve argued, pretty worthless. He knows how the season plays out, so hearing him prognosticate about what will happen in the game is akin to George R.R. Martin predicting the events of A Game of Thrones, the book he published in 1996.

Actually, I called Probst’s predictions “annoying bullshit.”

The form Probst offers those predictions has changed; now he does Q&As with Dalton Ross, and he continues to do pre-season press.

Recently, I’ve come to think that his “predictions”—especially the pre-season ones—may have some value to us as viewers and fans.

That’s because, as Survivor’s showrunner, Jeff Probst is the person who ultimately shapes how the game will go. Not just the themes, challenges, and twists, but the narrative, the edited and condensed version of events.

So his predictions can help us understand the lens through which he will view (or has viewed) the game and its players, and how he will tell the story.

And here’s the disappointing news today: Before a single minute of Survivor Cambodia: Second Chance‘s game was played, the person in charge of telling the 14-episode story decided that half of the female contestants have no chance.

Half. One quarter of the cast.

Jeff Probst’s sexism: Cambodia edition

“We have more people with a shot to win than we’ve ever had on any season. Without any comparison. I think it’s easier to say who doesn’t have a shot,” Probst told EW’s Dalton Ross on location earlier this summer.

So instead of predicting who would win, he talked about who could not win.

All those people are women.

They are:

  • Kass McQuillen
  • Peih-Gee Law
  • Kimmi Kappenberg
  • Abi-Maria Gomes
  • Shirin Oskooi

That is one quarter of the cast, and one half of the women on Survivor Cambodia: Second Chance. Dalton Ross notes that it’s half the women but didn’t challenge Probst on it, at least not in print.

Unfortunately, Probst’s sexism and/or his blindness toward it is so expected at this point that I barely noticed it at first.

To be fair, Probst did qualify his predictions for three of the women, saying that with Kimmi and Abi-Maria, it “depends on who she’s against” (that’s true for every single Survivor player ever!) and Shirin “could turn it.” Turn what? Oh yeah, Probst’s conclusion that she has no chance.

And for the record, Probst thinks every single man can win: “Everybody else, they can win against everybody. We have a lot of legitimate underdog likeable second chancers.” Of course, this includes five women, so Probst isn’t discounting every female.

Keep this in mind as you watch Survivor this season, especially every time you see Kass, Peih-Gee, Kimmi, Abi-Maria, and Shirin. They’re people he already decided cannot win. Will he treat them differently on camera? In the editing room? What kind of storylines will they get now that he’s decided they’re players who cannot win?

During the four seasons I went on location and interviewed contestants before the game, I certainly formed opinions about them and considered how well they might do. But what was so wonderful about that experience was that my first impressions and judgements were often wrong. For example, I thought JT Thomas had no chance, and he went on to play a beautiful game. To see my assumptions challenged and fail on screen was pretty thrilling.

I hope Jeff Probst regularly has that same experience. I fear that he might not.

All reality blurred content is independently selected, including links to products or services. However, if you buy something after clicking an affiliate link, I may earn a commission, which helps support reality blurred. Learn more.

More great stories

About the author

  • Andy Dehnart is the creator of reality blurred and a writer and teacher who obsessively and critically covers reality TV and unscripted entertainment, focusing on how it’s made and what it means.


I value our community at reality blurred, which connects people through open and thoughtful conversations about the TV we’re watching and the stories about it.

Comment rules: My goal is for us to be able to share our perspectives and exchange ideas in a welcoming, supportive space. That’s why I’ve created these rules for commenting here. By commenting below, you confirm that you’ve read and agree to them.

Happy discussing!