Skip to Content
reality TV reviews, news, and analysis since 2000

Three of America’s Got Talent 5’s four finalists were discovered by producers online

Of America’s Got Talent‘s final four, three of them didn’t show up to the auditions: two were recruited by the show’s producers, who found the performers online, while one came from the YouTube auditions.

Only Michael Grimm stood in line to audition, having been rejected last year. Fighting Gravity “was discovered virally, after five original group members performed at a campus talent show”; Prince Poppycock, aka John Quale, was discovered after “AGT producers found a Poppycock performance on the Internet and encouraged him to audition”; and Jackie Evancho was one of “12 performers selected for an August show based on YouTube video submissions,” USA TODAY reports.

As to tonight’s finale, Prince Poppycock, who’s been a favorite of mine, really blew it with his performance. He sang opera and did basically nothing else, though his set had a woman chained up. So it looks like it’s between young opera singer Jackie Evancho and Virginia Tech students Fighting Gravity. They put on a great performance, though it wasn’t perfect and a screw-up near the end revealed some of how they do what they do. Hopefully, despite that, their decision to give up a semester of college will be rewarded by viewers tonight with $1 million (or, actually, $375,000), and the show will be stay true to its claim that it’s about finding a Las Vegas-style act.

Who’s got ‘Talent’? It could be any one of these four finalists [USA TODAY]

All reality blurred content is independently selected, including links to products or services. However, if you buy something after clicking an affiliate link, I may earn a commission, which helps support reality blurred. Learn more.

More from reality blurred

About the author

  • Andy Dehnart

    Andy Dehnart is the creator of reality blurred and a writer and teacher who obsessively and critically covers reality TV and unscripted entertainment, focusing on how it’s made and what it means.

Discussion: your turn

I think of writing about television as the start of a conversation, and I value your contributions to that conversation. We’ve created a community that connects people through open and thoughtful conversations about the TV we’re watching and the stories about it.

To share our perspectives and exchange ideas in a welcoming, supportive space, I’ve created these rules for commenting here. By commenting below, you confirm that you’ve read and agree to those rules.

Happy discussing!