Talking yesterday to reporters about Gold Rush, Mark Burnett was asked by an AP reporter about the controversy surrounding Survivor Cook Islands, even though, as Variety notes, “[a] press advisory specifically had warned that he wouldn’t discuss ‘Survivor,’ but when a reporter asked Burnett about the controversy, he waved aside the AOL publicist’s objections and said he’d answer anyway.”
First, he said, “People are saying things who’ve never seen ‘Survivor’ … and don’t understand how it works.” He said that the nature of the game, and the fact that the show has so helpfully segregated tribes by race, has prevented the show from being a battle of the races.
“By putting people in tribes, they clearly have to get rid of people of their own ethnicity. So it’s not racial at all,” he said.
Burnett is certainly right that plenty of asshats are complaining about a show they don’t watch. But he’s also neglecting a major element of his own game: the merge. And as any student of Survivor knows, when tribes merge, they nearly always tend to retain their original tribal loyalties and alliances. Thus, it could very likely be a battle of the races post-merge, unless they’re not merging the tribes this season, or unless everyone forms new, inter-race alliances and joins hands around the campfire to sing Kumbaya.
All of reality blurred’s content is independently selected, including links to products or services. However, if you buy something after clicking an affiliate link, I may earn a commission, which helps support reality blurred. Learn more.