Corey’s lawyer says he has but won’t reveal “explicit,” “incriminating” evidence.

Corey’s lawyer says he has but won’t reveal “explicit,” “incriminating” evidence.
Apparently upset that attention has shifted away from his client for 45 seconds, Corey Clark’s lawyer told the AP that Corey “has ‘explicit’ and ‘incriminating’ evidence into their alleged affair.” But since he’s a big tease/dumbass, Corey has no “plans to voluntarily reveal additional incriminating evidence, which he possesses, to the general public that undoubtedly proves the extent of their involvement because of its explicit nature.” His lawyer, Richard B. Jefferson, added that they will “fully cooperate with any governmental agency that launches an investigation stemming from his claims.” Seriously, Corey could have concrete, verifiable evidence of the existence of extraterrestrials, Osama bin Laden’s location, and next week’s lottery numbers, and I just wouldn’t care because he’s such an self-serving asshat.
+ update: Matt Drudge quotes a FOX source who says Corey can identify “a ‘distinguishing characteristic’ few have seen, only those who have been intimate with her.”

advertisement